The new Manchester United dream field exposed to the risk of repeating the Tottenham trap Manchester United

forThis will come and will come – but you must realize that you will be left with large debts, which is an element of the story with which Kevin Kostner has taken a distinctive position. Any reason Dreams field It was about building a baseball stadium in the Iowa state of Joa Jackson, and Chicago Black Sox Ghosts in 1919 instead of, for example, Daniel Levy to build a football stadium in Harinji for Vincent Yansen and the remnants of the Tottenham Hotspur team 2019.

Last week, Manchester United unveiled plans for a new stadium of 2 billion pounds, which is 100,000, next to Old Trafford, while Newcastle was reported to be looking to move from St. James Park to a 65,000 stadium in Park. Everton will move to a new stadium in Bramley-More Dock next season. Wrexham builds KOP 5500. The new stadiums suddenly are fashionable again after a period when it became almost a later idea. This, perhaps, is an unintended result of the rules of profitability and sustainability (PSR).

Most clubs find that moving to a new stadium works in the long run – at least in terms of attracting fans. Perhaps the largest unilateral reason for the position of Manchester United as the largest club in England – although Manchester City’s revenue is above – is that in 1910 they moved to Old Trafford, at that time the biggest and best stadium in the country.

The average presence of Arsenal these days is slightly more than 60,000, while Hype is only 38,000. Tottenham similarly gets about 61,000 instead of 36,000 in White Hart Lane. There were times when the 48,000 Sunderland Stadium in the light was that the average attendance should be about 40,000 instead of 21,000 in the last season in Roker Park, although it was a lower division. Even West Ham, whose fans have a clearly contradictory situation towards the London Stadium, have witnessed the audience up to 62,000 from 35,000 since the departure of Abton Park.

See the most heavy causes of England – MK Dons, Port Vale, Tranrere Rovers, Colchester UNITED and WiGan Athletic – and tends to be specific issues that have caused a variation between the stadium size and support that exceeds the arrogance of a very large stadium.

It may be said that Colchster was excessive in building a stadium with a weakness of their average presence even when they were in the championship, but it seems that 10,000 are almost excessive somewhere in which the largest place to entertain in Esix and hosted Ishon John, Lionel Richie and the first.

But there is a cost. Arsenal has always provided the warning story. Their misfortune took a bold decision to leave Highbury – which was not very simply enough to allow them to compete with Manchester United – in the wrong time. It took nine years from the start of the operation in 1997 to the first match in the Emirates, and by the time they reached there, the financial scene has completely changed.

Not only did the broadcast revenue increase to reduce the importance of gate receipts and hospitality, but Roman Abramovich took over in Chelsea. Just like his money, which was not verified in any form of financial financial play (FFP), was the Premier League, and Arsenal was to limit their spending to meet the interest payments on the debts of the stadium.

The exact moment in which Arsene Wenger’s gifts began to fade, but Arsenal’s conflicts to keep pace with Chelsea and a unit after winning the title in 2003-2004, at least in the beginning, caused a large part of the financial restrictions she was working with.

This was an unfamiliar story. Nutingham Forest had taken a similar gamble in 1979-1980, when she started working in a new situation that took a decade, and was on his way, responsible for Forest’s failure to build on their successes in the European Cup where the fall between Brian Chloe and his long assistant Peter Taylor was.

The Tottenham Form was already a decrease when they reached the Champions League final in 19-19, a season, thanks to the cost of their big new stadium, they did not receive a single signature.

But the FFP regulations means that the type of boast made by Abramovich is no longer possible. Local television rights have achieved a calm, and while external rights continue to climb, the meaning is that they are close to its peak. Clubs that have to generate their own revenues for PSR purposes have turned into two taxes: selling local talents and revenues from the stadium.

Commercially, the new Tottenham land has achieved great success. The financial results of the past year offer receipts that match up to 117 million pounds and commercial revenues, which include care and promotion and tourist attractions for visitors, conferences and events on the stadium, up to 227.7 million pounds of total revenues of 549.6 million pounds.

Since Tottenham was scratched at the bottom half of the Premier League this season, there was a lot of ridicule of focusing on American football, boxing and concerts, but the problem is less than the way in which revenues are generated from the fact that a few of them are not spent on the players.

For Newcastle, the new stadium appears to come with a few risks. Investment in infrastructure is exempted from PSR accounts, and therefore a new stadium to generate revenue is a way for the Public Investment Fund in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to put large funds in the club that would achieve the return and be within the regulations. Feeling of benefits may take a few years, but much less time than if the stadium is funded through a standard loan.

This is where Manchester United should be careful, whatever the issue of moving after two decades of neglecting Old Trafford. They already have benefits of benefits of about 50 million pounds annually, therefore, even if general financing is secured, it is difficult to see how they do not double that at a time when the funds are required for a full reform of the team.

Build it and they will surely reach a new Old Trafford, but as Tottenham found, as Arsenal and a forest have found in the past, some thought should be given to what they are watching as soon as they are there.