‘I would absolutely press charges’: Reddit explodes over boyfriend using girlfriend’s emergency fund without permission
the Aita (Am I fool) Subreddit is famous for exciting discussions, but a recent participation ignited a wave of anger. woman It turned into I responded to the advice after the discovery of her boyfriend got $ 1500 from the Emergency Savings Fund of $ 2000 without her permission. As expected, the responses were fast, united and openly immediately.
Let’s divide it
The original poster (OP) has saved its own emergency fund, making it separate from its daily financial resources. Her boyfriend, Jake, has been struggling since he lost his job, and she is already helping him in grocery and gas stores.
Last week, the Jake car collapsed, and the total repair bill reached 1500 dollars. When I told him that she could not cover the cost, she suggested that he ask the family or make a payment plan. The problem was solved, right? mistake.
A few days later, I noticed that her savings account had lost $ 1500. And that is when I discovered that Jake turned the money to himself using her laptop, while she was sleeping. His justification? “We are a team, and you were not using money anyway.” Let’s stop for a moment to appreciate the audacity.
When facing him, Jake promised to pay it “as soon as he gets a job,” but instead of showing remorse, he doubled by contacting her selfishness. He argued that she was not supporting him during a difficult time. It is more than the clay, that some of their participating friends scatter, saying it was very harsh to ask the money.
Redit agrees
The internet reaction is a resounding NTA (not fool). Reddit users quickly indicated that this is not a slight error or misunderstanding – it is stealing. One of the upper comments suggested that she pressed the charges immediately, and most of the responses chanted this feeling. Society gathered around the optional protocol, focusing on the fact that her boyfriend’s actions were not financially harmful, as she was a flagrant violation of confidence and a great red science in the relationship.
The story highlights deeper issues that go beyond the same money. Trust, borders and respect are the basis of any healthy relationship, and Jake’s three ignore. His decision to take money without asking and then trying to justify that it indicates that it is not accountable and maturity that would give anyone to stop.
For the poster, this position is an invitation to wake up. Many commentators urged her to demand her money, but also to reconsider the relationship completely, and contacted the police to report the theft. If someone feels replaced by you without your consent, what can justify them in the name of “team?”
This is not only about the financial limits, but rather to recognize manipulation and stand against it. As many Redditors indicated, being in a relationship does not mean giving up your independence or allowing someone to exploit your resources.
Ruling
Jake’s actions were a manipulative, selfish and frank criminal. Relations flourish on mutual respect and clear limits, and this appears to be one lacks both. The ruling is clear: OP is NTA, and it will be completely justified in taking legal measures, demanding its money, and leaving this toxic relationship behind it. Some red flags cannot be ignored, and this is one of them.
