‘Meant for the children of slaves’: Trump disgustingly discredits birthright citizenship for immigrants’ children
Donald Trump tried to justify the end of the newly born citizenship with his unfortunate justification so far.
In a modern press conferenceTrump told the correspondents that the consuming citizenship was “dedicated to children of slaves” and that the whole world was not supposed to come and accumulate in the United States. “
Trump’s comments surrounding the newborn citizenship are a basic distortion of the purpose of practice, and his efforts to retreat A century. The idea of citizenship born for the first time in the constitutional law was devoted in 1866 with the ratification of the fourteenth amendment, which reads the first sentence, including: “All the people born or naturalized in the United States, and are subject to the jurisdiction of it, are citizens of the United States and the state where they reside.” .
The amendment has been approved for a previous correction to be determined The notorious Scott issueThe Supreme Court’s decision of 1857 justifies slavery and leads the nation to the civil war. Dred Scott’s decision was an exception to public law practices in the field of birth and made black Americans and their grandchildren unqualified to become citizens, whether they were born within the borders of the country or not.
In 1898, the Supreme Court ruled that the immigrants were under the protection of citizenship in the field of birth as a result Wong Kim Ark against the United States. Wong was the son of two Chinese immigrants and said that he should be entitled to obtain relevant citizenship regardless of the migrants’ situation for his parents because of the fact that he was born in America, and thus under the protection of the fourteenth amendment.
Trump’s executive order With regard to the newborn citizenship Attempts to create a vulnerability In the law of citizenship in the field of birth. The language of the matter reads that “birth in the United States does not in itself prevent a person to citizenship, and the person must also be” subject to the authority of the United States “, which means that immigrant children are not subject to the” judicial jurisdiction “of the United States because their parents are from foreign countries. Then the executive order tries to justify this claim by citing the American Court case 1884 Native Americans have been deprived of the right to reach Citizenship because they were not subject to the jurisdiction of the American government.
According to legal scholarsTrump administration logic is deeply racist. “They are digging to ancient old Indian law issues, and they find the most racist points they can win.” Professor of Michigan University Matt Fletcher wrote. The University of California, Professor Irvin Liu Chavez, called for a non -valid comparison of Trump, saying that Trump’s executive is “the heat of sweat to make a political argument instead of a legal argument.” Professor of Law Faculty at Harvard Gerald University wrote. Newman that the matter is legally doubtful, and instead it extends from the Trump administration “I publicly expressed the phobia of foreigners and prejudice.”
A legal precedent has been created on the historically born citizenship Expand Human rights, do not retreat from it. Trump’s attempt to justify a racist agenda by referring to the victims of the American racism itself is a very defective and very ridiculous reading of American laws aimed at protecting the weak. Judge John Kognor also wrote in his decision to issue a temporary restriction against Trump’s executive order, as he is also. “Not firmly unconstitutional.“The cough is not alone in this opinion, and 22 democratic countries filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration Accordingly. While Trump He believes that the Supreme Court will be by his sideThe court will work well to honor its human heritage and prove otherwise.
