Global music describes a suit “not like us”.

With the removal of Drake “Not Like us”, written by Kindrik Lamar, who is now officially the most famous rap of rap ever, the registration brand behind both artists is to reject Drake’s defamation lawsuit, on the pretext that her words are just a “series of excessive insults”, linguist Franka from any of any mixing.

On Monday’s file at the American District Court of the Southern Region in New York, the company, known as UMG, presented the first great response to the lawsuit filed in January on behalf of Drake, the artist born Aubberry Drake Graham. He accused the mark of defamation and harassment, claiming that the path of Lamar “aims to transfer the specific real claim, which is unambiguous, that Drake is a criminal anomaly, and suggests that the public must resort to vigilance justice in response.”

Last month, “not like us”, who accuses Drake of admiration of young girls, among other personal attacks, he won five Grammy Awards, including the song and the record for this year, and presented the Lamar’s Super Bowl performance axis.

According to UMG, Drake lost, “He lost the battle of rap music that he raised in which he participated in a good mind” and then “filing a lawsuit on his registration mark in a misleading attempt to replace his wounds.” The scholar, who was martyred in depositing her words by both artists associated with heavy battle last year, added that Drake had directed “incendiary attacks similarly in Lamar” and that the tone of the successor and the back has made the demand for defamation impossible.

“He ignores the other Drake and Lamar Diss paths that surround” do not love us “as well as DISS path agreements,” she said, adding: “Diss paths are a common artistic form and celebrated about manufactured insults, and they will calm down strongly if a Drake suit is allowed to move forward.”

In the lawsuit, Drake’s lawyers argued that “not like us” was outside the pale of the typical rappery meat because the accusations of the song were framed as a fact – for example, using its cover art map Drake’s house with the signs of the perpetrators of the perpetrators of the accumulated sex at the top, and this led to the opposite of the real world, citing fire on stay days after the release of the song that was included in the introduction, where it was called. “Pizzagate”. The claim also cited another attempt, enjoying infringement of the infrinists in the days after that.

The Drake Legal Team Michael J In a statement on Monday in response to the UMG file, Gottlieb said: “UMG wants to pretend that this is related to the battle of rap music in order to pay the attention of shareholders, artists and the public from a simple fact: A Jash company ultimately holds the reserve responsibility of serious information that has already resulted in multiple violence.”

To prove defamation, a public figure like Drake must appear that wrong and destructive information has been published on intentionally and with slag. Drake’s lawsuit has argued that UMG will not keep a long -term commercial relationship with him if she had a reason to believe that any allegations of sexual assault were correct, and that the brand motivated the disintegration of the Drake brand because his contract would be soon to re -negotiate.

UMG says that instead of conveying the truth, “not like us” and its associated promotional materials, including the art of cover and music video, was full of pictures that were “satirical and glass”, in line with the previous songs in beef, including Drake’s words that accused Lamar home abuse.

“No reasonable exhibitor believes that the image of Drake Palace in Toronto with 13 marks committed real sexual;” Moreover, the wider context evaluation shows that “not like us” relates to the well -known disputes that Drake admitted and perpetuated, ”including in previous words. In the role of Tupac Shakur, he addresses Lamar: “He talked about young girls, this is a gift from me / heard it on Budden, it should be correct.”

The deposit also denies that the promotion of “Not Like Us” has called the harassment, accusing Drake of trying to “the violent metaphors cavity in the lyrics of songs, despite the use of a similar language in his songs against Lamar.” In short, as with the claim of his defamation, Drake seeks to reduce a form of artistic expression that he himself embraced. “

Drake’s latest album, “Some Sexy Songs 4 U”, a cooperative project with the singer and producer Partynextdooor, first appeared in No. 1 on the Billboard album scheme last month, which is the fourteenth version of the rapper to do so, although its numbers were relatively modest. The album was partially released by Drake’s partner, Republic Records, a UMG company.