Damon Alban, Annie Linux, Kate Bush’s protest album on the artificial intelligence law

Kate Bush, Damon Alban, Annie Linux, Cat Stevens, Klash and Hans Zimmer among 1,000 artists shown in a new collaborative album that was released on Tuesday, but you will not hear any of their music.

Instead, their new record is 47 minutes and 17 seconds of relative silence and white noise, which is a sad symptom of the sound of music if there are no artists to actually create it. The album, is called Is this what we want?It is a protest record aimed at the UK government, which studies changes in the law that would give artificial intelligence companies permission to use publication -protected work unless artists specifically penetrate.

Critics expressed concern about the method of canceling the subscription, as the album organizers said it “reflects the principles of the law of copyright.” The organizers said on Tuesday: “It is impossible to impose distraction models, and they were not effective anywhere in the world, and put huge burdens on artists, especially emerging talents.”

“In future music, will our voices be interested?” Bush said.

Billy Ocean, Ed O’Brien, Jamirokai, Emogen Komak and Tori Amoos are among other artists who participated in the project. The album consists of 12 tracks that make the addresses of individual songs, “The British government should not start stealing UO music.” Any profits can result from the album to a charity called musicians.

Is this what we want? It was organized by Ed Newton-Rex, an early-to-intelligence music developer who is now somewhat training, which is not profitable for artificial intelligence companies to obtain licenses to train their models on copyright content.

“The government’s proposal will deliver the life of the country’s life to artificial intelligence companies, for free, allowing these companies to exploit the work of musicians to abandon them,” Newton Rex said in a statement. “It is a plan that will not only be disastrous for musicians, but it is completely unnecessary: ​​the UK can be leaders of Amnesty International without throwing the leading creative industries in the world under the bus. This album explains that, however, the government is trying to justify it, the musicians themselves They are united in their comprehensive condemnation of this unbearable plan.

The UK’s proposal was expected to be unlucky in the music industry, which called for strict regulations for artificial intelligence companies to ensure that their businesses were not used except with an explicit permission of the rights holders. The main posters filed a lawsuit on two of the most music generation services from artificial intelligence – Suno and UDIO – last year, claiming that companies violate thousands of businesses to train their models without a license.

British music icons, including Paul McCartney and Elton John, have spoken of the call to abandon the proposed changes. “We are the people, you are the government. You are supposed to protect us. McCartney said in an interview with him in January,” If you are going through an invoice project, be sure to protect creative thinkers or creative artists or you will not get it. “

John also said in a separate interview: “This will reduce and threaten the profits of young artists further. The music community rejects it with sincerity.”